Skip to content

    👋 Quick question — how are we doing?

    AI Governance for Boards and CXOs
    Cambridge Judge Business School

    AI Governance for Boards and CXOs

    Cambridge Judge Business School, Cambridge
    3 daysDuration
    in-personFormat
    EnglishLanguage
    Governance & BoardsTopic

    Next Available Cohort

    Choose your preferred start date

    Jul 15 - Jul 17, 2026
    3 days · in-person · Instructor-Led · Cambridge
    Open
    $6,329

    All-inclusive program fee

    About This Program

    AI governance is one of the most critical challenges facing corporate boards today. While 43% of organisations view AI risk as a major strategic hurdle, research reveals a deeper crisis: 66% of board members report limited to no experience with the technology. Future‑proofing your organisation requires moving beyond reactive compliance to a proactive model of resilience. Leadership alignment and resilient operating models are now essential to driving business impact and institutional value. Yet AI presents a unique challenge, marked by rapidly moving targets and genuine ‘unknown unknowns’. Standard governance assumes you can define what you are governing; with AI, you often cannot. Drawing on expertise across 5 University of Cambridge departments, this programme equips senior leaders to govern under conditions of radical uncertainty. Through immersive simulations, including the OpenAI board crisis and analysis of failures like the Boeing 737 MAX, you will develop the power of informed challenge and the frameworks required for effective oversight, without needing technical depth. This is not compliance training. It is governance capability building, providing a personal AI Governance Audit and a board‑ready 90‑day action plan to secure your organisation’s future.

    Why Cambridge Judge Business School?

    Few business schools can place executive participants inside a working research university ranked among the top five in the world — and fewer still can do it in a city where the density of scientific and technological innovation is matched only by the weight of 800 years of academic tradition. Judge is where rigorous social science meets real organisational problems, and where the networks you build over a week can span a Nobel laureate's laboratory and a Series B founder's office.

    Your Profile

    • Board members, chairs, and non‑executive directors of listed and private companies, non‑profits and public bodies.
    • C‑suite executives with governance responsibility, for example CEOs, CFOs, COOs, CROs, CDOs and CTOs.
    • Senior public‑sector leaders accountable for AI‑enabled services and institutional risk.
    • Chief Risk Officers, Chief Data Officers, and Heads of AI or Digital designing AI governance architecture.
    • Trustees and governors of organisations deploying or procuring AI systems.
    • Experienced senior leaders preparing for board roles who need credible expertise in AI governance.

    Benefits

    • Greater confidence in governing AI at board level. Build the capability for informed challenge without needing technical expertise.
    • Sharper judgement under uncertainty. Move beyond compliance‑driven or reactive decisions to proactive strategic oversight.
    • First‑hand experience of governance failure and redesign through 2 high‑stakes immersive simulations.
    • Deeper insight into AI governance failure points, using real‑world board‑level cases from leading technology, infrastructure, and financial institutions.
    • A board‑ready toolkit, including structured question sets and governance language for high‑impact AI oversight discussions.
    • Enhanced professional credibility in strategic AI conversations with senior stakeholders, regulators, and investors.
    • A powerful peer network of senior leaders: board members and CXOs from multiple sectors facing similar AI governance challenges.
    • Stronger board‑level oversight. Enhance the collective capability to manage AI‑related risk, opportunity and ethical exposure.
    • A structured AI governance audit. Identify specific institutional gaps and priorities through a rigorous, faculty‑led assessment.
    • Improved institutional resilience. Build readiness for technological and regulatory shifts, including alignment with EU AI Act obligations.
    • Clearer governance architecture. Establish a unified framework for AI development, procurement, and deployment that bridges technical, legal, and risk silos.
    • Reduced strategic exposure. Minimise the risk of reputational, accountability, and regulatory failures through better‑informed decision‑making.
    • Higher‑velocity strategic decision‑making. Move from static forecasts to dynamic scenario thinking for more robust AI investment decisions.
    • A board‑ready 90‑day action plan. Leave with a pragmatic roadmap aligned to your institutional priorities, with built‑in accountability.

    What You'll Learn

    • Why AI is categorically different from previous governance challenges.
    • Risk vs uncertainty: the limits of standard frameworks.
    • Scenario planning methodology for AI governance.
    • Fireside conversation with AI policy leader.
    • Immersive roleplay: governing AI development as decision‑makers.
    • Competitive dynamics, safety‑speed trade‑offs, cooperation dilemmas.
    • Connecting simulation dynamics to your own governance context.
    • Corporate governance structures for AI oversight.
    • Committee design, information rights, escalation protocols.
    • AI ethics and accountability in practice.
    • Board crisis simulation based on Harvard Business School case.
    • Decision‑making under pressure with incomplete information.
    • Governance redesign: building structures that prevent failure.
    • Personal AI Governance Audit launch.
    • Accountability architecture: board, management and vendor responsibility.
    • Three‑jurisdiction regulatory landscape (EU AI Act, UK, US).
    • Boeing 737 MAX: automated systems oversight and information flow.
    • Comparative governance analysis across 6 real‑world cases.
    • ‘Design the ideal AI governance structure’ exercise.
    • Personal AI Governance Audit completion.
    • Board‑ready question set and 90‑day action plan.
    • Peer review and challenge.
    • Accountability pairing with a cohort member.
    • Programme synthesis and closing.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    How to Apply

    1. 1

      Check your eligibility

      Review the entry requirements listed on this page. Most executive programs require 8–15 years of professional experience.

    2. 2

      Compare programs

      Use Gradia's comparison tool to evaluate up to 3 programs side-by-side on fees, duration, format, and accreditation.

      Compare programs →
    3. 3

      Contact the school

      Send a message directly to Cambridge Judge Business School via Gradia to request a brochure or speak with an admissions advisor.

    4. 4

      Prepare your application

      Gather your CV, reference letters, and any required test scores. Many EMBA programs waive standardised tests for senior candidates.

    5. 5

      Submit your application

      Apply directly through Cambridge Judge Business School's official application portal.

      Apply now →